Monday, March 26, 2007

Smoking and the Breath of Life

There is an anti-smoking commercial with a singing cowboy who has lost his tongue, apparently, to tobacco. The cowboy sings, "You don't always die from tobacco/Sometimes you just lose a lung./You don't always die from tobacco./ Sometimes they just snip out your tongue."

I think the commercial does an excellent job of showing concrete devastations of smoking. It is easier to think about losing a tongue than the vague, "Smoking kills." It also highlights the nature of verbal communication. As smoking takes your breath away by condemning your lungs, and by removing your tongue so is the person affected. Communication is an intricate element to human existence and speaking is one of the most intimate abilities. Without breath we cannot speak.

The other day I was listening to a lecture by Father Raniero Cantalamessa and he was talking about the importance of the Spirit and the spoken word. God's Spirit, or Breath (ruach in Hebrew), is the transmission of God's Word (Son). God's Word cannot be spoken without God's Breath; our words cannot be spoken without breath (as the singing cowboy illustrates). For this reason, Father Cantalamessa urged the preacher to remember the Spirit in the preaching of the Word. Without God's breath, the Word is not preached.

(Theological Question: What does this say about the order of generation? If God's Breath carries God's Word, then does the Son also proceed from the Spirit, as well? Where's Terry Tiessen when you need him?)

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't understand why it is that the Son has to "proceed" from any other member of the Trinity. Can you explain this to us?

3/26/2007 02:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rather, AP, it is because the Spirit proceeds from the Son that in operation, the Spirit is the presence of the Risen One. Filioque, Filioque, Filioque.

Terry Tiessen
(not really)

3/26/2007 02:24:00 PM  
Blogger Aaron Perry said...

Hi Anonymous: I am not sure exactly what it means for the Son to "have to" be generated by the Father. (When I think of have to, I think of me having to eat to live.) But it seems that God exists in a way that is not collapsable into one mode of being, or person, and that these modes, or persons, are not simply interchangeable. There is relationship, which is inherently generative. That God is this way is not captured by "necessity," as though we arrive at this thought by thinking really hard. It seems to me the implications of God's revelation. Sorry for evading the questions.

More importantly, though, I am most definitely sure that I cannot explain this. So, I point to the New Testament where Jesus comes from his Father and that the Father sends the Spirit in the name of Jesus.

3/26/2007 03:04:00 PM  
Blogger Aaron Perry said...

Crusty Guy: I am in agreement that in salvation history the Spirit follows the work of the Son and presents the Son who presents the Father. And I would say (and here I am presuming you agree) that salvation history reflects the immanent Trinity. But it is the Spirit who empowers Jesus to live as he does; and it is the Spirit of God who hovers before the Word of God is spoken to the tohu wabohu in Genesis. Thoughts?

3/26/2007 03:06:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home